Capo Unified May Close a School

Three charter campuses want access to school district classrooms, putting the squeeze on space. Staffers say CUSD will have to shut down an existing school or relocate a large number of students.

school officials will need to close a campus or relocate a large number of students next year to accommodate three charter schools that want access to district classrooms.

In addition to Oxford Preparatory Academy, a K-8 school that currently shares space with with  in Mission Viejo, the district has received requests from two other charters,  and Journey School, for free access to school district facilities.

Under voter-approved Proposition 39, school districts must make classrooms available to charters that serve district students.

Charter schools are public schools. The vast majority of students at these campuses come from other Capo Unified schools.

Oxford is pushing to , but even if the request is rejected, the district may be forced to close a school, according to a staff report to be discussed at Wednesday’s Capistrano Unified school board meeting.

“Oxford Preparatory Academy’s eligibility for facilities remains an issue and they are entitled to receive facilities under Proposition 39 regardless of the outcome” of the leadership’s request to expand from 628 to 772 students, says a staff report on where to house Oxford students next year.

“The need to close a school or relocate a portion of a school will be the case under either enrollment scenario,” the report states.

The report does not make clear whether Barcelona Hills might be the school to close. And a spokesman for Capo Unified declined to answer Patch's questions about the matter.

District staff is recommending against Oxford’s plan to increase enrollment. In a 10-page report, it derided the charter school bid for lacking teacher signatures and analysis of facilities, staffing or finances. It also notes that it is too early to determine whether the school offers a successful educational model.

The report is peppered with repeated variations on the words “concerned” (14 mentions), “unlikely” (nine mentions) and “fail” (also nine mentions).

But even if the school board agrees and rejects expansion at Oxford, the charter school has the right to enroll an average daily attendance of 501 students. This would be more than the number of students who attend the charter school today, as Oxford voluntarily reduced enrollment last year to .

When the school board approved the campus-share configuration in June, it envisioned the charter occupying 13 classrooms. Wednesday’s report says Oxford will use 21 classrooms if the expansion request is approved, and 17 if it is not.

However, maps attached to the report conflict with those numbers. They show Oxford using 25 classrooms if the charter is allowed to expand, leaving just two classrooms. If trustees reject the expansion, the maps show Oxford taking up 21 classrooms, leaving six classrooms for other district uses.

Although the district has the right to split Oxford into two schools -- elementary and middle -- staffers have chosen to keep the K-8 model Oxford requested. And although the charter’s first months “,” staff recommends Oxford remain at Barcelona Hills.

The school board meets at 7 p.m. Wednesday at district headquarters, 33122 Valle Road in San Juan Capistrano.

shelly January 27, 2012 at 02:41 PM
Capo Parent, Brick ran against union endorsed candidates. He was not supported or endorsed by the union. There are 4 current trustees who were on the former board. They ran as "Reform" Trustees. They ran and campaigned together. These are Trustees Addonizio, Bryson, Brick and Palazzo. They ran against union endorsed candidates. The vote for closing BH was 6 to 1 correct. Currently there is a mixed board of varying opinons and support. This is always a good thing.
Penny Arévalo January 27, 2012 at 04:22 PM
Sorry JG, but publicly elected officials are open to more scrutiny and attacks than a private citizen commenting here. They know they'e fair game when they throw their hat into the ring and run for office.
Pam Sunderman January 27, 2012 at 04:54 PM
People who post anonymously also have an obligation (moral and ethical) to refrain from making such hurtful and unsubstantiated claims against someone, no matter how public a figure they are. I would hope that this would be as important to your editorial board (or whoever makes the rules for posting) as making sure we all refrain from personal attacks against each other. Posting on these boards open us up to the occasional personal attack. Some are more objectionable than others but most personal attacks are more a reflection on the writer than the receiver. Are there no limits at all? What is Mr. Brick to do about people spreading false rumors on your site?
Penny Arévalo January 27, 2012 at 05:07 PM
I've emailed him several times on this issue, but he has never written back. He has the dais from which he can speak but never does (in all the agenda items the board has discussed in the 1 1/2 years I've been covering CUSD, he has only voiced an opinion or asked a question two times that I can remember). He has a press willing to interview him. He has the ability to tap the expertise of the district's spokesman. As an elected official, he has much more ability to defend, clarify and address the public than a private citizen. He chooses not to.
Pipes January 06, 2013 at 07:12 PM
Brick's grand daughter went to Journey School and he voted to keep her low test scoring and low enrollment charter school on the largest campus CUSD had to offer at the time. Hmmm...just a coincidence?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »