Will Prop. 30 Fix CUSD's Budget Hole? Nope

A post-election analysis shows more tough decisions lie ahead.

Although Prop. 30 was billed as a way to restore school funding, it won't be enough to stave off Capo Unified's multimillion-dollar budget woes.

If the measure had failed, CUSD faced a $51-million shortfall next year. But even after the passage of Prop. 30, the district is still looking to cut $31 million from the 2013-14 school year. That figure represents about 10 percent of the current budget.

In June, trustees put a bandage on the budget gap by adopting a one-year contract with employee groups.

Here’s how CUSD balanced the books for the 2012-13 school year:

  • Increased class sizes by an average of 1.5 students at all grade levels
  • Continued a 1.2 percent salary cut already in place
  • Continued three unpaid furlough days already in place
  • Added five unpaid instructional days, to be lopped off at the end of the school year
  • Froze regular salary step-and-column increases for six months

The district also made $11 million in cuts to other areas.

Class sizes in Capo already exceed state maximums. The district sought waivers to go beyond those limits. The waiver for grades 4-8 expires at the end of this school year. The waiver for kindergarten through third is good through June 2014.

So, any decision to continue with the current class sizes will take another vote from the board, at least for grades 4-8.

What are the trustees in the newly constituted board thinking? Only newcomer Jim Reardon responded to Patch’s inquiry.

"As a new board member and a member of a clear minority, I will have the unique opportunity to weigh in, but the decision about how to balance that budget will be made by the majority – the same people who brought CUSD to the point of this difficult decision," he said. "My priority will be to protect the quality of opportunity we provide our students."

Here’s state Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson’s reaction to Prop. 30 passing: “Passage of Proposition 30 means parents and students across the state can breathe a collective sigh of relief, knowing that our schools will have the resources to stay open for the remainder of the year."

Dawn Urbanek November 13, 2012 at 03:18 AM
Money meant for the classroom instead went for union activities—the same union that extorts money from the teachers—in the millions, each year. If you want to be a union” leader”—then the union should pay for it instead of a 4th grader. Humm? Sounds like CUSD to me? http://capoliticalnews.com/2012/10/03/sucking-the-life-out-of-americas-public-schools-the-expense-of-teachers-union-contracts/
Dawn Urbanek November 13, 2012 at 03:21 AM
Shelly - you are a Stepford Wife - beating your head against reality.
Dawn Urbanek November 13, 2012 at 03:21 AM
Oh I meant mother- who advocates against the best interest of their own children?
Antoine November 13, 2012 at 03:28 AM
Dawn - You're a fraud and nothing but a union basher. Instead of finding solutions you're turning this into a mean-spirited snorfest.
Penny Arévalo November 13, 2012 at 03:34 AM
Enough with the insults. I'm gonna close this thread for a cooling off period.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »